Job racket case against Senthilbalaji: Madras High Court dismisses plea against clubbing chargesheets

You May Be Interested In:Woodpecker woes: Calgary couple pay out of pocket to fix bird-related damages | Globalnews.ca


V. Senthilbalaji. File
| Photo Credit: PTI

The Madras High Court on Friday (March 28, 2025) dismissed a plea made against the clubbing of four supplementary chargesheets filed by it in a job racket case pending against Electricity Minister V. Senthilbalaji.

Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan dismissed the petition filed by Anti Corruption Movement, a private organisation, after perusing a counter affidavit filed by Government Advocate (criminal side) K.M.D. Muhilan, on behalf of Chennai Central Crime Branch police. 

To get today’s top stories from the State in your inbox, subscribe to our Tamil Nadu Today newsletter

The petitioner organisation had approached the High Court against the decision taken by a Special Court for cases against Members of Parliament and those of the Legislative Assembly, to club all four supplementary chargesheets.

Explaining the reasons for opposing the clubbing of chargesheets, the petitioner organisation said, the first supplementary chargesheet was with respect to alleged corrupt practices in the appointment of Assistant Engineers in State Transport Corporations when Mr. Senthilbalaji served as Transport Minister in former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa’s Cabinet.

That chargesheet had listed out 74 individuals as accused and 112 witnesses. The second chargesheet related to the appointment of Junior Tradesmen had also listed out many accused and 287 witnesses. The third chargesheet pertaining to the appointment of bus conductors had 928 accused and 151 witnesses.

The fourth chargesheet filed in connection with alleged irregularities in the appointment of bus drivers had 920 accused and many witnesses. If all the four chargesheets were clubbed together, the number of accused would increase to 2,256 and the number of witnesses would shoot up to over 668, the organisation complained.

“If these many accused and witnesses have to be examined as well as cross-examined, then it would take 1,500 years for the trial to be completed. Therefore, it is essential that the four supplementary charge sheets are not clubbed together,” the petitioner’s counsel had argued.

share Paylaş facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

N.L. schools ordered to destroy new books containing 'inaccurate information' on Indigenous people | CBC News
N.L. schools ordered to destroy new books containing ‘inaccurate information’ on Indigenous people | CBC News
Adam Willett
Woman pleads guilty to manslaughter in Saskatoon man’s stabbing death
poets
‘Heroes’ — Chimczuk Museum exhibit highlights Windsor literary history
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra dummy units surface, show off sleek rounded corner design
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra dummy units surface, show off sleek rounded corner design
'24 in 24': Sask. woman's initiative collects almost 750 kg of food for the community | CBC News
’24 in 24′: Sask. woman’s initiative collects almost 750 kg of food for the community | CBC News
With overthrow of Assad regime, Syrian Canadian recalls 20 years of 'torment' inside its prisons | CBC News
With overthrow of Assad regime, Syrian Canadian recalls 20 years of ‘torment’ inside its prisons | CBC News
Pulse of the World | © 2025 | News